Comments on: Barack Obama Vs John McCain Who will be the Next President? http://www.amitbhawani.com/blog/barack-obama-john-mac-cain-us-president/ Stay Updated with the Latest Tech Info! Sun, 21 Mar 2010 01:42:34 +0000 hourly 1 By: Vote for Hope - Barack Obama Campaign Video | General Updates http://www.amitbhawani.com/blog/barack-obama-john-mac-cain-us-president/#comment-14747 Vote for Hope - Barack Obama Campaign Video | General Updates Fri, 31 Oct 2008 12:30:45 +0000 http://www.amitbhawani.com/blog/?p=732#comment-14747 [...] our last post which tells you why you should vote, also check out our Barack Obama Vs John McCain article. Now Barack Obama has started a video campaign which is really worth watching atleast [...] [...] our last post which tells you why you should vote, also check out our Barack Obama Vs John McCain article. Now Barack Obama has started a video campaign which is really worth watching atleast [...]

]]> By: Joan of Arc http://www.amitbhawani.com/blog/barack-obama-john-mac-cain-us-president/#comment-14553 Joan of Arc Mon, 27 Oct 2008 16:36:32 +0000 http://www.amitbhawani.com/blog/?p=732#comment-14553 I find it very amusing to hear Obama is going to crack down on the the lobbyist. Is that after this years election and he gets elected? Don't think they would appreciate that. In looking at the record of type of campaign contributions, he has received a similar amount to that of McCain. I consider that a ploy to encourage votes from the unsuspecting voter! I find it very amusing to hear Obama is going to crack down on the the lobbyist. Is that after this years election and he gets elected? Don’t think they would appreciate that. In looking at the record of type of campaign contributions, he has received a similar amount to that of McCain. I consider that a ploy to encourage votes from the unsuspecting voter!

]]> By: Joan of Arc http://www.amitbhawani.com/blog/barack-obama-john-mac-cain-us-president/#comment-14552 Joan of Arc Mon, 27 Oct 2008 16:18:42 +0000 http://www.amitbhawani.com/blog/?p=732#comment-14552 I need answers, not excuses! Why does the Democratic Party choose to remain silent about Obama’s questionable National Security clearance since this is essential for him to perform his job as President of the United States and also assure us of his qualification? Have they done a great in-service to the people and our country by sweeping the issue under the carpet in fear that it could jeopardize the election! It is unclear to me why an adequate and essential background/security check was not accomplished in a timely manner on Obama prior to his running and being elected to the Senate representing the State of Illinois. To make matters worse, the Democratic Party decides to endorse him again as a potential candidate for the President of the United States fully knowing his questionable associations. The reason for not doing an adequate and acceptable background check is” that the only requirements for a Senator or President is they must be born in America, be the required age (30 or 35) and be a resident for so many years in the state for which they would choose to run”. Now that is the general overall requirement but should not be misconstrued to mean even if you have a criminal background you could be employed in a top level government position, or does it? Every employer conducts some form of background check if they use good sense and doesn’t hire individuals that show questionable areas of concern in their history. So I don’t buy the inference that: • One was done but a few discrepancies would require further clarification but was not deemed essential or critical to disqualify Obama from running for the Senatorial position, a decision made by the Democratic Party and not the state agency whom is required to accomplish the independent and non bias investigation. • His association with Wright, Ayers, Rezko, and Frank Marshall Davis were merely acquaintances and not people he dealt with or had seen on a regular basis. • He did not lie about his Muslim faith and education; he just did not disclose it since he switched over to Christianity. It was only done as a precaution to avoid unfair discriminatory practice that he has faced most of his life! I find it extremely sad for a man of high intelligence with a excellent law degree finds it necessary to be so devious, treating us like we are totally stupid and then chooses to use the racist card so readily to secure votes from his constituents. Questions about his student loans and debts, his drug use, birth certificate, and associations with questionable individuals still go unanswered. If the situation of his background clearance had happened prior to the 911 terrorist attack on New York, It may have been labeled as extreme carelessness. However, since this happened well after that (2004/2005) and after extreme measures were taken to assure utmost security for the American people, it must be looked upon as a deliberate act of omission by the Democratic Party as well as Obama with little regard for the national security of our country. Sudden appearance of documentation at this late date should be looked upon as a ploy to cover up, similar to that of the Watergate scandal involving Nixon. The only exception instead of documents disappearing, in this case they would miraculously be reappearing (misplaced in error!) and would be back dated to suit the situation. To avoid further corruption in the Democratic Party, immediate action should be taken against all those who perpetrated the deception and failed to take measures to correct it before the campaign proceeded this far. Obama should not qualify as a Presidential candidate and should be expelled from his Senatorial seat in the same manner Nixon was. Hilary Clinton’s attempt to secure answers was looked upon as mere jealousy and not taken further. I would appear that The Democratic Party in favoring Obama unjustly lost her the opportunity to be elected in the Presidential election. I need answers, not excuses!
Why does the Democratic Party choose to remain silent about Obama’s questionable National Security clearance since this is essential for him to perform his job as President of the United States and also assure us of his qualification? Have they done a great in-service to the people and our country by sweeping the issue under the carpet in fear that it could jeopardize the election!
It is unclear to me why an adequate and essential background/security check was not accomplished in a timely manner on Obama prior to his running and being elected to the Senate representing the State of Illinois. To make matters worse, the Democratic Party decides to endorse him again as a potential candidate for the President of the United States fully knowing his questionable associations.
The reason for not doing an adequate and acceptable background check is” that the only requirements for a Senator or President is they must be born in America, be the required age (30 or 35) and be a resident for so many years in the state for which they would choose to run”. Now that is the general overall requirement but should not be misconstrued to mean even if you have a criminal background you could be employed in a top level government position, or does it? Every employer conducts some form of background check if they use good sense and doesn’t hire individuals that show questionable areas of concern in their history. So I don’t buy the inference that:
• One was done but a few discrepancies would require further clarification but was not deemed essential or critical to disqualify Obama from running for the Senatorial position, a decision made by the Democratic Party and not the state agency whom is required to accomplish the independent and non bias investigation.
• His association with Wright, Ayers, Rezko, and Frank Marshall Davis were merely acquaintances and not people he dealt with or had seen on a regular basis.
• He did not lie about his Muslim faith and education; he just did not disclose it since he switched over to Christianity. It was only done as a precaution to avoid unfair discriminatory practice that he has faced most of his life!
I find it extremely sad for a man of high intelligence with a excellent law degree finds it necessary to be so devious, treating us like we are totally stupid and then chooses to use the racist card so readily to secure votes from his constituents.
Questions about his student loans and debts, his drug use, birth certificate, and associations with questionable individuals still go unanswered.
If the situation of his background clearance had happened prior to the 911 terrorist attack on New York, It may have been labeled as extreme carelessness. However, since this happened well after that (2004/2005) and after extreme measures were taken to assure utmost security for the American people, it must be looked upon as a deliberate act of omission by the Democratic Party as well as Obama with little regard for the national security of our country.
Sudden appearance of documentation at this late date should be looked upon as a ploy to cover up, similar to that of the Watergate scandal involving Nixon. The only exception instead of documents disappearing, in this case they would miraculously be reappearing (misplaced in error!) and would be back dated to suit the situation. To avoid further corruption in the Democratic Party, immediate action should be taken against all those who perpetrated the deception and failed to take measures to correct it before the campaign proceeded this far. Obama should not qualify as a Presidential candidate and should be expelled from his Senatorial seat in the same manner Nixon was.
Hilary Clinton’s attempt to secure answers was looked upon as mere jealousy and not taken further. I would appear that The Democratic Party in favoring Obama unjustly lost her the opportunity to be elected in the Presidential election.

]]> By: Joan of Arc http://www.amitbhawani.com/blog/barack-obama-john-mac-cain-us-president/#comment-14551 Joan of Arc Mon, 27 Oct 2008 15:45:08 +0000 http://www.amitbhawani.com/blog/?p=732#comment-14551 Why has nothing has been said about the Fannie Mae and Freddie Max controversy and the other financial institutions involved which by Congress’s failure to take action as far back as 2005, resulted in the worse financial meltdown over that of the Iraqan War. The reason for non-passage of legislation which could have minimized the extent of the financial disaster should be investigated and corrective action taken against all those individuals involved, discouraging this form of corruption at the government level. Why were three political figures signaled out to receive favorable contributions from Fannie Mae and Freddie Max (Obama, Kerry and Dodd)! Was this in payment of services previously rendered for stalling legislation and persuading Congress not to take action? Was voter influence used to sway Congress away from voting on the required legislation and look the other way to allow the financial institutions to acquire further wealth from the American people? How many people remember the Watergate cover up? Well now as far as I see it, we have another form of cover up, the Fannie Mae-Freddie Max cover up! Yet no action is being taken aside from the political parties, together with the public, pointing fingers at each other and appointing President Bush as the scapegoat. If President Nixon was charged for his involvement in Watergate, why do we not take affirmative action against those involved in this financial disaster that has affected our nation and Europe as well? So many individuals were affected and their lives drastically changed. This should not go unpunished. To avoid further cover up potential, a non-bias political investigation (I hope we have such a thing) should be instituted expediently as possible , as delays could increase the level of falsification or disappearance of documentation, if it hasn’t already. I hope the election process is not used to stall the investigation process. Why has nothing has been said about the Fannie Mae and Freddie Max controversy and the other financial institutions involved which by Congress’s failure to take action as far back as 2005, resulted in the worse financial meltdown over that of the Iraqan War.
The reason for non-passage of legislation which could have minimized the extent of the financial disaster should be investigated and corrective action taken against all those individuals involved, discouraging this form of corruption at the government level. Why were three political figures signaled out to receive favorable contributions from Fannie Mae and Freddie Max (Obama, Kerry and Dodd)! Was this in payment of services previously rendered for stalling legislation and persuading Congress not to take action? Was voter influence used to sway Congress away from voting on the required legislation and look the other way to allow the financial institutions to acquire further wealth from the American people?
How many people remember the Watergate cover up? Well now as far as I see it, we have another form of cover up, the Fannie Mae-Freddie Max cover up! Yet no action is being taken aside from the political parties, together with the public, pointing fingers at each other and appointing President Bush as the scapegoat. If President Nixon was charged for his involvement in Watergate, why do we not take affirmative action against those involved in this financial disaster that has affected our nation and Europe as well? So many individuals were affected and their lives drastically changed. This should not go unpunished.

To avoid further cover up potential, a non-bias political investigation (I hope we have such a thing) should be instituted expediently as possible , as delays could increase the level of falsification or disappearance of documentation, if it hasn’t already. I hope the election process is not used to stall the investigation process.

]]> By: JATORIA http://www.amitbhawani.com/blog/barack-obama-john-mac-cain-us-president/#comment-14212 JATORIA Tue, 21 Oct 2008 17:16:02 +0000 http://www.amitbhawani.com/blog/?p=732#comment-14212 MKAYy FiRST OFF WHO THE FUKk iS McCAiN?! DUDE JUS KWiT RiGHT NOW SERiOUSLY GO GET A HOBBY UR DEFiNTELY NOT iN YOUR RiGHT MiND i HAVENT HEARD YOU SAY ONE THiNG ABOUT THiS COUNTRY ONLY THiNG YOU CARE FOR iS THE TiTLE AND NOT THE iSSUES OBViOUSLY YOU NEED SLEEP iF YOU THiNK UR GONNA WiN THiS ELECTiON SORRY TRY AGAiN NEXT TiME OBAMA KNOWS WAT HE WANTS YOU NEED TO GET ONN HiS LEVEL AND STOP PLAYiN THESE LiTTLE KiD... THiS iS OUR COUNTRY UR TALKiN ABOUT AND WE AiNT FiNNA LET CHU FUKk iT UP DUDE LiKE SERiOUSLY GET A HOBBY DUMB LiTTLE LiON! XxTORiAxX MKAYy FiRST OFF WHO THE FUKk iS McCAiN?!
DUDE JUS KWiT RiGHT NOW SERiOUSLY GO GET A HOBBY
UR DEFiNTELY NOT iN YOUR RiGHT MiND
i HAVENT HEARD YOU SAY ONE THiNG ABOUT THiS COUNTRY
ONLY THiNG YOU CARE FOR iS THE TiTLE AND NOT THE iSSUES
OBViOUSLY YOU NEED SLEEP iF YOU THiNK UR GONNA WiN THiS ELECTiON
SORRY TRY AGAiN NEXT TiME
OBAMA KNOWS WAT HE WANTS YOU NEED TO GET ONN HiS LEVEL AND STOP PLAYiN THESE LiTTLE KiD…
THiS iS OUR COUNTRY UR TALKiN ABOUT
AND WE AiNT FiNNA LET CHU FUKk iT UP
DUDE LiKE SERiOUSLY GET A HOBBY
DUMB LiTTLE LiON!
XxTORiAxX

]]> By: Shaun Gale http://www.amitbhawani.com/blog/barack-obama-john-mac-cain-us-president/#comment-12577 Shaun Gale Fri, 12 Sep 2008 01:35:17 +0000 http://www.amitbhawani.com/blog/?p=732#comment-12577 What can John MCcain do for our country. Barack Obama has talked about the issues, how our country is suffering. What is their to understand? What can John MCcain do for our country. Barack Obama has talked about the issues, how our country is suffering. What is their to understand?

]]> By: Jo http://www.amitbhawani.com/blog/barack-obama-john-mac-cain-us-president/#comment-10565 Jo Fri, 18 Jul 2008 05:03:13 +0000 http://www.amitbhawani.com/blog/?p=732#comment-10565 Barack Obama is my definite choice. Barack Obama is my definite choice.

]]>